Skip to main content

Debt Mutual Funds: Can They Still Provide Better Returns Than Bank Deposits or Direct Bond Holdings?

Now that you are done with quickly deploying money in debt mutual funds in last few days of FY 2022 - 2023 to take advantage of indexation benefits which stand withdrawn from 1st April 2023 onwards, what would you do with any money coming your way which you do not want to put in growth (risk) investments like equities?

If you go by news, the money would move back to bank deposits now that fixed income investment area has been tax-levelled. We’ll see in a while what numbers say. Though for me, bank deposits beyond the insurance amount are a strict no. That said buying GILTS from RBI Retail Direct portal does deserve a serious thought now.

But first let’s look at some subjective benefits of keeping money in bond funds. I could think of two:

-          Liquidity. Bond funds are very liquid, while I cannot say for sure whether direct government bonds will be that liquid as I have never sold a GSEC in secondary market. In fact, not bought any in Gsec secondary market too. And retail market for government bonds will take time to develop to ensure similar liquidity as equity markets. Bond funds have a distinct advantage here as of now, though I feel government bond market liquidity will improve going forward if more and more people log on to RBI retail direct portal and start owning government bonds directly.

-          Administration: Direct bond holdings will pay periodic interest in bank account. If one doesn’t need to money, this presents administrative (and discipline) issues of ensuring not spending the money and reinvesting it quickly. When one invests through bond funds, one doesn’t see the interest money in bank account and the process of reinvesting goes on mostly uninterrupted

I see above as good enough reasons not to totally abandon bond funds. But then, let’s also bring in some objectivity and see whether bond funds still offer reasonable enough numerical advantage over direct bond holdings. With indexation benefits out, tax deferral is the only benefit which comes into play. Total benefit accrued will depend on three factors

-          Investment horizon. The higher the period of uninterrupted holding, better the outcome will be as deferred tax benefits keeps on compounding

-          Bond funds tracking error, a large part of which will come from funds total expense ratio

-          Individual’s current income tax rate and terminal (withdrawal) period tax rate. This by far will may turn out to be the most significant factor

 

My workings show if:

-          Your current and terminal marginal income tax rate remain same, one would need to have horizon of nearly 25 years to realize significant benefits of going the bond fund way. Significant means (no logic, just my way) terminal corpus via bond fund holding route being higher by at least 10% than through direct bond holding. 25 years is way to long investment horizon

-          Your terminal marginal income tax rate is two notches below your current marginal income tax rate. Say you are in 30% bracket now and post retirement, your tax bracket will be 10%. Bond fund investment horizon of nearly 10 years will do the job in such a situation

Effectively, on the numbers side, benefits have now gotten slightly tricky and need individualized “predictive” ability of terminal tax rate. Long term holdings can still get sizable benefits provided one is deft in managing redemptions as per his / her taxation situation. A lot depends on this. Too much hassle some would say. But nobody said making money was an easy game.

As for my money goes, I am in a very nice situation – most of my non equity money is already in bond funds. So this taxation change doesn’t hit me that bad. But for any additional non equity designated funds, I will probably go by following rule of thumb:

-          Upto horizon of 5 years, direct government bond holdings is the way to go

-          5 to 10 years horizon – some part, say 25% to 50% maybe directed to bond funds. I hope MF houses reduce TER for government bond funds to keep the game going for them. And us too

-          Beyond 10 years horizon: Large part, maybe even 100% be directed to bond funds

Don’t forget, each to their own. What works for me may or may not work for you.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lump Sum Equity Investing – The Capital Protection Way Part II

Long ago, here  I posted how I would go about investing a sizable amount in equity index funds. I assumed in this blog that for next 5 years, equity markets will enter their worst phase and deliver poor returns – in fact negative returns of 10% annualized for next 5 years. Such a bad phase would result in equity fund corpus down by nearly 41% in absolute terms. Have the equity markets done that bad historically? Not at all. The worst case 5 year equity markets performance, basis Nifty 500 Index TRI has been in covid times @ minus 1.4% annualized for March 2015 – March 2020 period. Essentially, our assumption of minus 10% annualized ROI for 5 years was way too bad than actual worse case seen. Let us redo the numbers basis some realistic data: -           Actual worst case 5 year CAGR seen:   Minus 1.4% -           Assuming things can go even worse than this sometime in future, we c...
Post a Comment
Read more

War And Equity Investments

Uncertain times are upon us. There is a shadow of war post killing of tourists in Pahalgam. So far, equity markets have not shown any signs of cracking up despite of high expectations of armed conflict with our wayward neighbour. Is it the calm before the storm as far as equity markets are concerned? It is anybody’s guess that if a protracted war does happen, economy will take a hit in near term, which in turn will impact our daily lives, including equity markets. When and how this will happen is again anybody’s guess. Should you take a relook at your equity investments in such a scenario? Nothing wrong in being a little conservative in such times. Here’s what I think can be considered:     -           Scenario I: You have designated INR 100 for equity investments and are fully invested. While you do have money in non equity investments, in case of equity market downturn, YOU WILL NOT PULL MONEY OUT OF SUCH INVESTMENTS AND DEP...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why SIPs Work Only When You Are at It For Significantly Long Time

No, this blog is not about how a SIP  running for long periods (10 years?) lets one weather the market cycles and average your buying cost. Enough has been said about it and that remains. By the way, there’s no standard definition of “LONG PERIOD” as such. It’s left open to investing entity!!! This blog is more towards accumulating capital, as (HIGH) returns really matter only when they are earned on reasonable amount of capital. Even extraordinarily high returns on piddling capital (savings) don’t amount to much in absolute numbers. And it takes time to build up capital if you are doing it gradually, even after taking impact of compounding. Let the numbers come to our help. But first, we need to establish some benchmark to evaluate how long should one run a SIP, alongwith a projected rate of return. Here’s a simple benchmark for SIP duration – my investment should double at the end of SIP period for a particular rate of return. I will consider that duration as “LONG TERM”. ...
Post a Comment
Read more