Skip to main content

Lump Sum Equity Investing – The Capital Protection Way


Assume I land up with a large corpus of money from some source. And I am tinkering with an idea to put a decent part of it in equity index funds. Just that I am getting jitters given the risk, even though I am sure of staying invested for good 10 years to come. How do I go about this?

With the current yield to maturity (YTM) of low risk overnight mutual funds hovering around 5% ish, I would dump the conventional wisdom of doing it gradually (SIP’ing it as they say) and deploy nearly 48% of the “large corpus” immediately. Yes, you heard it right – ASAP, at one go, market levels not withstanding.

Sounds crazy, no? On the face of it maybe, but the numbers I did have a different take, and I would tend to go with the numbers. Read on if you too want to check out the story numbers tell in this case.

Equity investing is “risky”, I get it, so does everybody else. But what does the word “risky” stand for in simple terms? While there are various definitions of “risky” when talking money and investments, the one which makes most sense to me is losing one’s capital, in nominal terms. Now we are getting somewhere – what will make me feel “safe” is “capital protection”, at least in nominal terms. I am ready to “risk the return” part but not the capital.

Say I assume a worst case scenario playing out and equity funds I invested in lose 10% every year. By the end of 10th year, my equity funds would be down by nearly 41% in absolute terms. That’s risk playing out. But on a portfolio basis, with balance capital of nearly 52% in overnight funds***, my capital still stays protected. See here for yourself. I have made myself a simple, transparent and efficient “Capital Protection” mutual fund investment plan. If I want to reduce the risk further, I will knock off another 8% from equity fund investments and keep my allocation to 40 – 60. This will hopefully take care of any downside in overnight funds YTM. However, to do some "regret minimization" of markets tanking post few days I deploy large sum in equity funds, I may look to doing this over a period of 6 months to 1 year. Not later than that. 

And lastly, bonus of doing the numbers, and possibly believing them, the upside of such “not so risky” venture if equity funds do better:

-          “Bad case scenario”: Rather than loosing 10% every year, equity funds stay flat for full 10 year period. Initial capital invested now grows to 1.31 times, which is same as getting annualized return of 2.73%

-          “Normal case scenario”: Equity funds gain 10% every year. Invested capital now grows to 2.07 times with annualized yield coming to 7.53%

Sounds to me as pretty safe way of taking reasonable equity exposure while keeping the risks in control!!!

 

***Another assumption implied here is overnight funds YTM remains constant through out investment period of 10 years. A big assumption this one too – but we got to have these assumptions to work out the numbers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lump Sum Equity Investing – The Capital Protection Way Part II

Long ago, here  I posted how I would go about investing a sizable amount in equity index funds. I assumed in this blog that for next 5 years, equity markets will enter their worst phase and deliver poor returns – in fact negative returns of 10% annualized for next 5 years. Such a bad phase would result in equity fund corpus down by nearly 41% in absolute terms. Have the equity markets done that bad historically? Not at all. The worst case 5 year equity markets performance, basis Nifty 500 Index TRI has been in covid times @ minus 1.4% annualized for March 2015 – March 2020 period. Essentially, our assumption of minus 10% annualized ROI for 5 years was way too bad than actual worse case seen. Let us redo the numbers basis some realistic data: -           Actual worst case 5 year CAGR seen:   Minus 1.4% -           Assuming things can go even worse than this sometime in future, we c...
Post a Comment
Read more

War And Equity Investments

Uncertain times are upon us. There is a shadow of war post killing of tourists in Pahalgam. So far, equity markets have not shown any signs of cracking up despite of high expectations of armed conflict with our wayward neighbour. Is it the calm before the storm as far as equity markets are concerned? It is anybody’s guess that if a protracted war does happen, economy will take a hit in near term, which in turn will impact our daily lives, including equity markets. When and how this will happen is again anybody’s guess. Should you take a relook at your equity investments in such a scenario? Nothing wrong in being a little conservative in such times. Here’s what I think can be considered:     -           Scenario I: You have designated INR 100 for equity investments and are fully invested. While you do have money in non equity investments, in case of equity market downturn, YOU WILL NOT PULL MONEY OUT OF SUCH INVESTMENTS AND DEP...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why SIPs Work Only When You Are at It For Significantly Long Time

No, this blog is not about how a SIP  running for long periods (10 years?) lets one weather the market cycles and average your buying cost. Enough has been said about it and that remains. By the way, there’s no standard definition of “LONG PERIOD” as such. It’s left open to investing entity!!! This blog is more towards accumulating capital, as (HIGH) returns really matter only when they are earned on reasonable amount of capital. Even extraordinarily high returns on piddling capital (savings) don’t amount to much in absolute numbers. And it takes time to build up capital if you are doing it gradually, even after taking impact of compounding. Let the numbers come to our help. But first, we need to establish some benchmark to evaluate how long should one run a SIP, alongwith a projected rate of return. Here’s a simple benchmark for SIP duration – my investment should double at the end of SIP period for a particular rate of return. I will consider that duration as “LONG TERM”. ...
Post a Comment
Read more