Here I looked at how to get a rough idea of valuing property for own use. I had a doubt whether the oft cited thumb rules make sense or they have long lost their relevance. After making life a bit complex by bringing in host of numbers, I did realize that if you are buying for your use, and with the “popular” capital structure of 25% down payment and rest on "loan", the thumb rule of buying property at maximum 15times is mostly in sync. Now we look at the rental scenario – you are buying property to rent out and make an income stream. Before we move on, to state it bluntly – I am biased towards “Not being a landlord”, ‘cause it’s too much work for the money to be made going by rental yield in Indian cities. But then, that’s my opinion and still no harm in checking what the numbers say. My opinion may also change!!!
That said, for rental property to
be a “value buy”, my guess is the costing should be way less than self-occupied
property. Why? For starters, when you occupy property yourself – it is at zero
cost, while when you rent, cost element comes into play. GOI’s income tax
department also let’s landlords deduct 30% from realized rent as costs, in
addition to interest outgo. This good blog also mentions
that cost of renting comes to around 31.4% plus financing cost. Looks like
GOI’s cost estimation for renting out is mostly on the mark (for a change).
Want to keep it simple – mark
down the maximum price you would pay for own use by at least 30% if you want to
buy for letting / renting out. If you are ready to pay 17 times going gross
rent for the property for own use, you should not pay more than 12 times when
buying to let / rent.
Or we can go the detailed numbers
way. This time, I tried a different methodology. If I want invest in a “buy to
rent” property, my objective is to create a regular income stream. What better
way than to compare the rental yield with risk free yield, post expenses and
tax? With RBI Retail Direct portal in action, I can now buy
a 30 year government bond which will give me “no effort” guaranteed half yearly
payment in my bank account for 30 years. To make it a value buy as per my
standards, the net annual rent from property after 5 years should match up
to the net interest paid by risk free investment.
Going by above established
standard, one should pay no more than 12.40 times annual rent for the property***.
It’s another matter than in India context it will be very difficult to land
with property valued as such.
One can argue that this approach
does not take into account expected appreciation of property. My counter is:
-
Try my calculator uploaded in the blog buying
property for own use. My guess is results will mostly be in line to above
working, IF YOU ARE CONSERVATIVE in your property appreciation rate assumption. One can justify any price by projection high appreciation rates, so mind that
-
Until and unless one can really get a distressed
deal, I don’t expect much appreciation from property for first 10 years. Decent
rental income, growing as per inflation is one’s best bet
-
Even a 30 year government bond can appreciate if
interest rates go down
Final word: A bit of qualitative
parameter: if I do not have 50% of property value to put as down payment, I
would steer clear of making such an investment. Going for a highly leveraged
“risk” investment is simply not my way to go about. But then, each to their
own.
Comments
Post a Comment