One of the biggest advantages of listed equity investing, either through mutual fund route or buying stocks directly - can be done in small ticket size.
Is it? Or is this flexibility resulting in sub optimal investor net
worth growth? In good many equity mutual funds, one can start dabbling in
stocks for just INR 500 a month. And mostly it remains at such piddling
amounts.
Ok, maybe i am exaggerating. Say this goes by 20 times and monthly investment rises to INR 10k per month in due course. Rarely equity investment amount would be pegged to monthly earning capacity and exceptionally to overall savings (net worth?). No surprises by the end of the investment period, equity investing did not make much difference to overall net worth as return on total wealth did not go up by much as compared to fixed rate investments.
A quick example: Say you have INR 25 Lacs to invest for 20 years.
Assuming equity investment delivers 12% while fixed rate investment delivers 6%
annualized ROI. Closing corpus after 20 years:
-
With 10%
equity allocation: Approx INR 90 Lacs. But the real issue here – while equity gives
high returns of 12%, your over portfolio ROI will be just 6.60%. A small equity
allocation didn’t make much difference in portfolio return
-
With 25%
equity allocation: Approx INR 106 Lacs. Overall
portfolio ROI rises to 7.50%.
-
With 50%
equity allocation: Approx INR 140 Lacs. A 40% increase in equity allocation
jacks up closing corpus by more than 56% and overall portfolio ROI goes up to
9%. This rate of return on overall portfolio will mostly beat inflation hands down
and then some
Comments
Post a Comment